Vitebsk Carpets

OJSC "Vitebsk Carpets"

UNP: 300082076 · 75 Maksim Gorky St., Vitebsk

City-formingMonopoliesRestructuring

Identification

UNP300082076
OKED13930 — Manufacture of carpets and carpet products
Legal formOJSC
Governing bodyGeneral Meeting of Shareholders
Address75 Maksim Gorky St., Vitebsk

Financial statements

k BYN

Line itemReporting yearPrior year
Fixed assets71 33465 849
Intangible assets2021
Investments in long-term assets3 3852 124
Long-term financial investments11
Total Section I (long-term assets)74 74067 995
Inventories58 35452 579
— materials13 07013 067
— work in progress10 1539 584
— finished goods and merchandise35 13129 928
Deferred expenses2925
VAT on acquired goods, works, services911862
Short-term receivables35 29838 397
Cash and cash equivalents3 1837 878
Other short-term assets5 4626 831
Total Section II (short-term assets)103 237106 572
BALANCE (assets)177 977174 567
Charter capital1 5021 502
Reserve capital2 0732 073
Additional capital84 66480 072
Retained earnings (uncovered loss)-8 816-3 160
Total Section III (equity)79 42380 487
Long-term loans and borrowings15 9736 750
Deferred income8 2267 786
Total Section IV (long-term liabilities)24 19914 536
Short-term loans and borrowings43 75242 656
Short-term payables30 60336 888
— to suppliers, contractors, providers25 85728 455
— on payroll1 6511 717
Total Section V (short-term liabilities)74 35579 544
BALANCE (equity and liabilities)177 977174 567

Computed metrics

K1 · Current ratio
1.388
Prior: 1.34(+3.6%)
F1.290 / F1.690
K1 · Own working capital ratio
0.045
Prior: 0.117(-61.5%)
(F1.490 - F1.190) / F1.290
K2 · Sales profitability
4.46%
Prior: 6.86%(-2.4 пп)
F2.060 / F2.010 × 100%
K2 · Net profitability
-4.09%
Prior: 0.66%(-4.75 пп)
F2.210 / F2.010 × 100%
K3 · Revenue dynamics
-15.7%
(F2.010_N / F2.010_N-1) - 1
K3 · Debt dynamics
17.4%
(F1.510 + F1.610)_N / (F1.510 + F1.610)_N-1 - 1
Operating cash-flow margin
27.6%
Prior: 31%
F4.040 / F2.010 × 100%

Integrity checks

Checks passed: 6 of 6

Balance sheet balances (assets = liabilities)
Cash-flow integrity
Cash-flow residuals
Cash position
Capital transition
Profit consistency

Signals

Red flags
  • First-ever net loss in 2025 (-5,132k BYN) against a profit in 2024 (+987k BYN)
  • Accumulated loss grew ×2.8 (from -3,160 to -8,816)
  • Revenue fell 15.7% — loss of market share
  • Long-term loans ×2.4 — debt build-up
  • Dividends discontinued (2024: 652k BYN → 2025: 0)
  • Own-working-capital provision 0.045 — below the 0.15 norm (production)
  • Capital supported only by long-term-asset revaluation +4,603 (paper growth, not operational)
Yellow flags
  • Wages fell -17.4% — possibly layoffs / rate cuts (social risk)
  • Finished-goods stocks up +17% (from 29,928 to 35,131) — a mild rise in unsold product
  • Debt-service cost rising (interest payable +31%)
  • Financial activity persistently negative — refinancing without net new funding
Green signals
  • Operations generate cash +34.7m BYN — the model works
  • Current ratio 1.39 — at norm for production (≥1.25)
  • BALANCE stable (177.9 ≈ 174.5m BYN)
  • Cash-flow margin 27.6% — a high operating-efficiency indicator

Recommendation

Suggested outcome
Restructuring
Category
Distressed
Health score
0.85
Confidence level
Medium

Vitebskie Kovry is a regional textile-industry enterprise (carpet and carpet-goods manufacturing, OKED 13930) that in 2025 fell into a net loss for the first time, against a 16% decline in revenue. Operating cash flow remains positive (+BYN 34.7m), indicating that the core model still works — the enterprise produces and sells, generating cash from operations.

The problem is not operations but the build-up of debt load: long-term loans grew 2.4× (from BYN 6.7m to 16.0m), while financing activity is consistently negative — refinancing without net new borrowing. The balance-sheet structure is not critical (current ratio 1.39 — normal for manufacturing, balance sheet stable at BYN 178m), but a three-year trend (2023→2024→2025) is needed for a confident classification. Proposed outcome — Restructuring (3): the operating model is viable, but the loan portfolio must be restructured and sales efficiency improved.

OSINT Belarus 2.0