Gorodeya Sugar Plant

OJSC "Gorodeya Sugar Plant"

UNP: 600031529 · 2 Zavodskaya St., Gorodeya urban settlement, Nesvizh District, Minsk Region 222611, Republic of Belarus

City-formingMonopoliesExport-orientedPrivatization

Identification

UNP600031529
OKEDsugar production
Legal formOJSC
Governing bodyCity-forming; "Belgospischeprom" concern; state share 100% (Republican)
State share100%
Parent holdingконцерн «Белгоспищепром»
Address2 Zavodskaya St., Gorodeya urban settlement, Nesvizh District, Minsk Region 222611, Republic of Belarus
Websitewww.gsr.by

Financial statements

k BYN

Line itemReporting yearPrior year
Fixed assets418 831389 221
Intangible assets15654
Income-bearing investments in tangible assets
Investments in long-term assets5 1702 958
Long-term financial investments1 5141 514
Long-term receivables
Total Section I (long-term assets)425 765393 869
Inventories191 736181 470
— materials58 19643 672
— work in progress9 5486 792
— finished goods and merchandise123 992131 006
— goods shipped
Deferred expenses125115
VAT on acquired goods, works, services8041 634
Short-term receivables102 74292 265
Short-term financial investments81
Cash and cash equivalents3 3379 246
Other short-term assets
Total Section II (short-term assets)298 752284 731
BALANCE (assets)724 517678 600
Charter capital50 09150 091
Reserve capital229192
Additional capital350 497310 593
Retained earnings (uncovered loss)101 56589 279
Total Section III (equity)502 382450 155
Long-term loans and borrowings27 61627 468
Long-term lease liabilities2 9924 287
Deferred income5 4174 901
Total Section IV (long-term liabilities)36 02636 657
Short-term loans and borrowings135 446110 835
Current portion of long-term liabilities7 77223 355
Short-term payables41 66255 285
— to suppliers, contractors, providers31 50648 507
— on payroll2 0101 734
— on lease payments1 6561 349
Total Section V (short-term liabilities)186 109191 788
BALANCE (equity and liabilities)724 517678 600

Computed metrics

Current ratio
1.605
Prior: 1.485(+8.1%)
F1.290 / F1.690
Absolute liquidity
0.018
Prior: 0.048
(F1.260 + F1.270) / F1.690
Own working capital ratio
0.256
Prior: 0.198(+29.5%)
(F1.490 - F1.190) / F1.290
Sales profitability
14.92%
Prior: 17.49%(-2.57 pp)
F2.060 / F2.010 × 100%
Net profitability
7.82%
Prior: 9.01%(-1.19 pp)
F2.210 / F2.010 × 100%
Revenue dynamics
5.62%
(F2.010_N / F2.010_N-1) - 1
Debt dynamics
17.9%
(F1.510 + F1.610)_N / (F1.510 + F1.610)_N-1 - 1
Debt load
0.594
Prior: 0.621
(F1.590 + F1.690) / (F1.590 + F1.690 + F1.410 + F1.460)
Operating cash-flow margin
F4.040 / F2.010 × 100%

Integrity checks

Checks passed: 1 of 6

Balance sheet balances (assets = liabilities)
Cash-flow integrity
Cash-flow residuals
Cash position
Capital transition
Profit consistency

Failed checks indicate gaps or inconsistencies in the source filing itself (typically in form F4, the cash-flow statement), not data-entry errors. The balance sheet (assets = liabilities) reconciles for every enterprise.

Signals

Red flags
  • Loan debt is almost entirely short-term and growing: short-term loans and borrowings 110,835 → 135,446k BYN (+22.2%) against long-term debt of 27,616; +17.9% combined over the year, with cash at 3,337.F1.610 · F1.510 · F1.270
  • The cash position fell by 64% (9,246 → 3,337k BYN) — 0.7% of annual revenue of 480,948, against short-term liabilities of 186,109.F1.270 · F2.010 · F1.690
Yellow flags
  • Margins are compressing: profit on sales fell by 9.9% (79,627 → 71,763k BYN) while revenue grew 5.6%; cost of sales rose 7.4% and selling expenses 52.6%. Sales profitability to revenue moved 17.49% → 14.92% and net profitability 9.01% → 7.82%.F2.060 · F2.010 · F2.020 · F2.050 · F2.210
  • Finished goods of 123,992k BYN are 65% of inventories of 191,736 and 26% of annual revenue; they fell 5.4% over the year while materials grew 33% (43,672 → 58,196).F1.214 · F1.210 · F2.010 · F1.211
  • Receivables grew by 11.4% (92,265 → 102,742k BYN) against revenue growth of 5.6%.F1.250 · F2.010
  • Other current-activity flows are twice gross profit: other income of 199,886 and other expenses of 216,197k BYN against gross profit of 100,829 — their net result is negative.F2.070 · F2.080 · F2.030
Green signals
  • Own working capital is adequate and growing: the provision ratio is +0.256 against +0.198 a year earlier; current liquidity is 1.605 against 1.485 — short-term assets of 298,752k BYN against liabilities of 186,109.F1.490 · F1.190 · F1.290 · F1.690
  • Payables to suppliers fell by 35% (48,507 → 31,506k BYN) and total short-term payables by 25% (55,285 → 41,662).F1.631 · F1.630
  • Equity grew by 11.6% (450,155 → 502,382k BYN): retained earnings added 12,286 and revaluation surplus 39,904.F1.490 · F1.460 · F1.450
  • The business is profitable: net profit of 37,605k BYN on revenue of 480,948, with 12,727 of profit tax charged. Long-term loans are stable (27,468 → 27,616) and the current portion of long-term debt fell from 23,355 to 7,772.F2.210 · F2.010 · F2.160 · F1.510 · F1.620

Recommendation

Suggested outcome
Privatization
Category
Stable
Health score
1.16
Confidence level
Medium

OJSC "Gorodeya Sugar Plant" is a large (balance sheet BYN 724,517k, revenue BYN 480,948k, 1,023 employees) profitable enterprise in the "Belgospischeprom" concern, one of Belarus's four sugar plants. State share 100% (Republican).

Recommendation: Privatization — (a) a profitable enterprise with clear economics — a private owner can operate it without state support and preserve value; (b) the sugar sector is mature, technology is standard, market price-discovery works (world sugar prices) — there is no need for state investment for a technological breakthrough; (c) a 100% state share with proven operational stability is upside for privatization revenue: the state can realize the asset without loss of production capacity (4 plants in the whole country, Gorodeya among the largest by production share); (d) restructuring is not required — the fundamentals are healthy; (e) liquidation contradicts the logic (a profitable asset). Privatization while preserving strategic significance (sugar — food security; 4 plants in the whole country) requires conditions: either minority-share retention by the state, or a golden share, or conditions on production continuity + workforce protection. This is a policy-level question; the pre-recommendation is flagged for further refinement at the level of the responsible authority.

Why privatization. Financial condition is structurally healthy: current ratio 1.61 (> threshold), own working capital ratio +0.256 (> threshold), sales profitability 14.92%, net profitability 7.82%, permanent capital confidently covers long-term assets (1.265x). The enterprise pays dividends into the concern (BYN 8,920k for 2025), which confirms real profitability and a cash return on state capital.

Confidence: MEDIUM. Not HIGH, on two grounds. First: only forms F1+F2 are available (without F3 and F4) — we cannot verify operating cash flow (F4 absent) or changes in equity (F3 absent), which sets baseline confidence to MEDIUM. Second: there are margin-compression signals (sales profitability −2.57pp, net profitability −1.19pp, debt dynamics +17.9%) — the enterprise is not on a downward trajectory, but at a pivot point: continued margin compression may require revisiting the outcome in the next reporting period.

Gorodeya Sugar Plant — BELSOE