Agrofirm Luchniki

OJSC Agrofirm Luchniki

UNP: 600043549 · 5A Tsikova St., Luchniki agro-town, Slutsk District, Minsk Oblast

District-levelSubsidy-dependentPrivatization

Identification

UNP600043549
OKED01500 — mixed farming (crop production combined with livestock)
Legal formOJSC
Governing bodyState (90.67% of the charter fund); governing body — general meeting of shareholders
State share90.67%
Address5A Tsikova St., Luchniki agro-town, Slutsk District, Minsk Oblast

Financial statements

k BYN

Line itemReporting yearPrior year
Fixed assets40 22836 350
Intangible assets
Income-bearing investments in tangible assets
Investments in long-term assets741 618
Long-term financial investments
Long-term receivables
Total Section I (long-term assets)40 30237 968
Inventories21 57518 356
— materials10 7899 416
— work in progress607348
— finished goods and merchandise53115
— goods shipped
Deferred expenses
VAT on acquired goods, works, services2 8283 038
Short-term receivables4 0082 019
Short-term financial investments
Cash and cash equivalents11871
Other short-term assets
Total Section II (short-term assets)28 52923 484
BALANCE (assets)68 83161 452
Charter capital20 86220 862
Reserve capital4242
Additional capital16 72213 992
Retained earnings (uncovered loss)15 85913 234
Total Section III (equity)53 48548 130
Long-term loans and borrowings1 0741 668
Long-term lease liabilities2 4571 775
Deferred income
Total Section IV (long-term liabilities)3 5313 443
Short-term loans and borrowings2 1341 887
Current portion of long-term liabilities764598
Short-term payables8 9177 394
— to suppliers, contractors, providers7 1275 913
— on payroll392369
— on lease payments998813
Total Section V (short-term liabilities)11 8159 879
BALANCE (equity and liabilities)68 83161 452

Computed metrics

K1 · Current ratio
2.415
Prior: 2.377(+1.6%)
F1.290 / F1.690
K1 · Own working capital ratio
0.462
Prior: 0.433(+6.7%)
(F1.490 - F1.190) / F1.290
K2 · Sales profitability
19.3%
Prior: 12.38%(+6.92 пп)
F2.060 / F2.010 × 100%
K2 · Net profitability
9.19%
Prior: 9.1%(+0.09 пп)
F2.210 / F2.010 × 100%
K3 · Revenue dynamics
10.96%
(F2.010_N / F2.010_N-1) - 1
K3 · Debt dynamics
-9.76%
(F1.510 + F1.610)_N / (F1.510 + F1.610)_N-1 - 1
Operating cash-flow margin
1.31%
Prior: 5.71%
F4.040 / F2.010 × 100%

Integrity checks

Checks passed: 6 of 6

Balance sheet balances (assets = liabilities)
Cash-flow integrity
Cash-flow residuals
Cash position
Capital transition
Profit consistency

Signals

Yellow flags
  • Cash flow from current activity weakened sharply: result 1,533 → 391k BYN (OCF margin 5.7% → 1.3%), even though profit grew — cash is tied up in inventories and receivables.
  • Inventories grew 18% (from 18,356 to 21,575k), short-term receivables almost doubled (2,019 → 4,008k) — working-capital build-up outpaces revenue.
  • About a third of net profit is provided by state support: without it the result would be 1,772 instead of 2,737k BYN.
  • Financial-activity expenses rose sharply (1,080 → 2,805k) — higher servicing cost and exchange-rate differences.
Green signals
  • Revenue growth of 11% on real activity (29,789 versus 26,847k BYN).
  • High and rising sales profitability: 12.4% → 19.3%; bottom-line profitability 11.4%.
  • Solid liquidity: current 2.42 against the norm of 1.25; working-capital ratio 0.46 against the norm of 0.15.
  • Credit load down 10%; steady dividend payment; real equity sustainably positive.

Recommendation

Suggested outcome
Privatization
Category
Financially strong
Health score
1.23
Confidence level
High

Agrofirm Luchniki is a district-level agricultural enterprise (Slutsk District) with a stable financial position and good operating profitability. Revenue grew 11% on real activity, sales profitability rose from 12.4% to 19.3%, and net profit increased to 2,737k BYN. The balance sheet is solid: current liquidity 2.42, working-capital ratio 0.46, real equity sustainably positive, credit load down 10%. Two caveats temper the assessment: cash flow from current activity weakened sharply (OCF margin 5.7% → 1.3%) due to funds being tied up in inventories and receivables — for the agricultural cycle this is a seasonal phenomenon rather than a sign of distress; and about a third of net profit is provided by state support (without it profit would be 1,772k). The enterprise is operationally viable and does not require strategic state control: the preferred outcome is privatization with a stable profile and conditions (cost discipline, justification of capital investment, gradual reduction of subsidy dependence), consistent with the logic of transferring district agricultural enterprises to sector investors.

OSINT Belarus 2.0