Bobruiskagromash Holding MC

OJSC Management Company of the Bobruiskagromash Holding (with branches)

UNP: 700067572 · 5 Shinnaya St., Bobruisk

HoldingsCity-formingExport-orientedRestructuring

Identification

UNP700067572
OKEDManufacture of agricultural machinery
Legal formOJSC
Governing bodyMinistry of Industry of the Republic of Belarus
Parent holdingХолдинг «Бобруйскагромаш» (головная организация)
Address5 Shinnaya St., Bobruisk

Financial statements

k BYN

Line itemReporting yearPrior year
Fixed assets157 270137 444
Intangible assets2 5312 086
Investments in long-term assets2 5492 465
Long-term financial investments18 00618 007
Other long-term assets554453
Total Section I (long-term assets)180 356160 002
Inventories62 27750 792
— materials36 02226 645
— animals being raised and fattened5 2926 066
— work in progress12 88911 542
— finished goods and merchandise8 0746 539
Deferred expenses288284
VAT on acquired goods, works, services932647
Short-term receivables34 35131 336
Short-term financial investments15
Cash and cash equivalents1 68610 339
Total Section II (short-term assets)99 53593 403
BALANCE (assets)279 891253 405
Charter capital36 99636 996
Reserve capital843843
Additional capital108 944100 501
Retained earnings (uncovered loss)-83 954-86 884
Total Section III (equity)62 82951 456
Long-term loans and borrowings51 04843 938
Long-term lease liabilities1 1011 185
Deferred income4 96940
Provisions for future payments137123
Total Section IV (long-term liabilities)57 25545 286
Short-term loans and borrowings104 78675 095
Current portion of long-term liabilities1 45214 325
Short-term payables53 56967 243
— to suppliers, contractors, providers38 50619 714
— on advances received8 49841 980
— on taxes and duties426550
— on social insurance and security820643
— on payroll2 7062 155
— on lease payments432384
— to other creditors2 1811 395
Total Section V (short-term liabilities)159 807156 663
BALANCE (equity and liabilities)279 891253 405

Computed metrics

K1 · Current ratio
0.623
Prior: 0.596(+4.5%)
F1.290 / F1.690
K1 · Own working capital ratio
-1.181
Prior: -1.162(-1.6%)
(F1.490 - F1.190) / F1.290
K2 · Sales profitability
8.86%
Prior: 7.25%(+1.61 пп)
F2.060 / F2.010 × 100%
K2 · Net profitability
1.84%
Prior: 0.68%(+1.16 пп)
F2.210 / F2.010 × 100%
K3 · Revenue dynamics
35.86%
(F2.010_N / F2.010_N-1) - 1
K3 · Debt dynamics
30.92%
(F1.510 + F1.610)_N / (F1.510 + F1.610)_N-1 - 1
Operating cash-flow margin
-8.6%
Prior: 4.4%
F4.040 / F2.010 × 100%

Integrity checks

Checks passed: 6 of 6

Balance sheet balances (assets = liabilities)
Cash-flow integrity
Cash-flow residuals
Cash position
Capital transition
Profit consistency

Signals

Red flags
  • Real equity is deeply negative: charter + accumulated loss = 36,996 − 83,954 = −46,958k BYN. The positive total of Section III (62,829) holds solely on additional paid-in capital from revaluation (108,944) — structural decaying capital masked by revaluation.
  • Operating cash flow is negative: −17,660k BYN (a year earlier +6,683). With growing accounting profit, the enterprise burns cash in its core activity.
  • Current liquidity ratio 0.62 — half the norm of 1.25; working-capital ratio −1.18. Current assets cover only 62% of current liabilities.
  • Short-term loans and borrowings grew 40% (75,095 → 104,786k BYN); total loan-and-borrowing load +31%. Growing dependence on short debt.
  • Accumulated uncovered loss −83,954k BYN — large-scale, though it shrank slightly over the year (−86,884).
Yellow flags
  • Interest payable of 7,879k BYN absorbs a significant part of operating profit; debt service is a serious item.
  • Cash fell from 10,339 to 1,686k BYN — the liquidity buffer is nearly exhausted.
  • Abnormally large other income/expenses from current activity (165,580 / 169,910k BYN) — probably intra-holding turnover (an MC with branches); they distort the comparability of operating indicators and require cautious interpretation.
  • Short-term payables on advances fell sharply (41,980 → 8,498): a possible reduction in the portfolio of customer prepayments.
Green signals
  • Revenue grew 36% (151,110 → 205,295k BYN) — strong positive sales momentum.
  • Profit on sales almost doubled (10,951 → 18,188k BYN), sales profitability rose from 7.3% to 8.9%.
  • Net profit grew 3.7× (1,033 → 3,785k BYN); profit from current activity +13,858k BYN.
  • Fixed assets grew 137,444 → 157,270 (investment in the production base continues).

Recommendation

Suggested outcome
Restructuring
Category
Distressed
Health score
0.77
Confidence level
High

The Management Company of the Bobruiskagromash Holding is a large machine-building holding (manufacture of agricultural machinery) under republican subordination, town-forming for Bobruisk. As of 2025 the enterprise shows a sharply dual profile: operating growth against deep structural financial weakness.

The operating side is strong: revenue grew 36% (to 205,295k BYN), profit on sales almost doubled (18,188k BYN), net profit grew 3.7× (3,785k BYN). The enterprise is building up fixed assets and expanding sales. But the financial structure is decaying. Real equity — charter plus accumulated loss — is −46,958k BYN; the positive total of Section III (62,829) exists only thanks to additional paid-in capital from asset revaluation (108,944). This is structural distress masked by revaluation. Operating cash flow is negative (−17,660k BYN): despite accounting profit, the core activity burns cash — growth tied up working capital, and the gap is financed by short loans. Current liquidity is 0.62 (half the norm), the cash buffer is nearly exhausted (1,686k BYN), and short-term loans grew 40%.

The picture is complicated by abnormally large other turnover from current activity (income 165,580 / expenses 169,910k BYN) — almost certainly intra-holding flows of a management company with branches, distorting comparability. Total comprehensive income (13,542k BYN) is largely formed by revaluation (9,757) rather than the operating result.

This is the profile of an over-indebted growing machine-building holding: the market and revenue are rising, but capital is negative on a real measure, liquidity is critical, and debt is growing avalanche-like. Strategic significance (large machine building, export potential, town-forming status) rules out liquidation. Restructuring is recommended with an emphasis on remediation of the debt structure: restructuring the short loan portfolio into long, restoring own working capital, normalizing the cash cycle. With operating growth preserved, a combination with targeted state investment in working capital is possible. The key risk is not the operating model (it works) but the financing structure.

OSINT Belarus 2.0